NAT444 or ?
Dobbins, Roland
rdobbins at arbor.net
Sun Sep 11 11:33:39 UTC 2011
On Sep 11, 2011, at 4:02 PM, Leigh Porter wrote:
> I'd agree that, usually, distributed is better but these are not distributed networks, there is a single point (or a few large single points) of contact.
The point is that these aggregations of state are quite vulnerable, and therefore they should be as distributed as is practicable.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
The basis of optimism is sheer terror.
-- Oscar Wilde
More information about the NANOG
mailing list