NAT444 or ?

Sat Sep 10 11:26:06 UTC 2011

On Thursday, September 08, 2011 04:48:16 PM Leigh Porter 
wrote:

> Soon, I think content providers (and providers of other
> services on the 'net) will roll v6 because of the
> performance increase as v6 will not have to traverse all
> this NAT and be subject to session limits, timeouts and
> such.

I certainly hope so - let's hope ISP's go out and deploy v6 
beyond the core, as content providers deploy v6 for their 
content, rather have a stand-off between both ends of fence 
on who should move first.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20110910/8781004f/attachment.sig>