Pricing for Comcast Connectivity

Ren Provo ren.provo at gmail.com
Fri Sep 9 14:11:01 CDT 2011


Hi Oscar,

John is right about the NDA.  Feel free to reach out to Steve Lacoff,
as noted at http://www.comcast.com/dedicatedinternet/

Volume, location, term, etc. are all factors to consider.  Steve will
be at NANOG if you, or others have questions.

Cheers, -ren

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:01 PM, John van Oppen <jvanoppen at spectrumnet.us> wrote:
> I think all pricing is under NDA for the direct connectivity...   we have it, and I know it is under NDA for us...
>
> Comcast is in the becoming a tier1 game in a big way so avoiding people who don't already peer with the is probably a plus if you want great connectivity to them.    The AS paths I would avoid are _3356_7922_ (usually fine, but subject to the fight de jour between level3 and Comcast) and anything on _6453_7911_ (subject to being saturated all the time).   Last I checked AS2914 and a few others still only see Comcast via 6453 which made that sub-optimal.
>
>
> I can send you a AS7922 sales contact if you need it, just hit me up off list...  they also have a good list of info on peeringdb for people to contact.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> John van Oppen
> Spectrum Networks  AS 11404
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oscar Caraig [mailto:oscarcaraig at Safe-mail.net]
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 10:28 AM
> To: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Pricing for Comcast Connectivity
>
> List,
>
> Does anyone have sample pricing for Comcast's Paid Peering (http://www.comcast.com/dedicatedinternet/) service they'd be able to share?
>
> Also, are there any transit ISPs to avoid when reaching Comcast?  I remember discussion last winter about Tata being congested, and would like to understand how common these issues are.  I'm preparing to launch a large video broadcast for the state, so any advice would be appreciated.
>
> Thank you,
> Oscar Caraig
>
>
>




More information about the NANOG mailing list