NAT444 or ?

Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Wed Sep 7 17:11:57 CDT 2011


On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 16:13:26 EDT, Dorn Hetzel said:

> Perhaps it can be made ever so slightly less ugly if endpoints get an
> "address" that consists of a 32 bit IP address + (n) upper bits of port
> number.
> 
> This might be 4 significant bits to share an IP 16 ways, or 8 significant
> bits to share it 256 ways, or whatever.

And you store the 4 or 8 bits in what part of the IPv4 header, exactly?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20110907/174346a2/attachment.bin>


More information about the NANOG mailing list