NAT444 or ?

Wed Sep 7 10:11:18 UTC 2011

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arturo Servin [mailto:arturo.servin at gmail.com]
> Sent: 07 September 2011 01:37
> To: Serge Vautour
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: NAT444 or ?
> 
> 
> 	NAT444 alone is not enough.
> 
> 	You will need to deploy it along with 6rd or DS-lite.
> 
> 	Whilst you still have global v4, use it. The best is to deploy
> dual-stack, but that won't last for too long.
> 
> Regards,
> as-

I'm going to have to deploy NAT444 with dual-stack real soon now. So I am expecting to see some issues.

A+P would be nicer perhaps, but none of the CPE I have will support it. I'll try and give people who do NAT in their CPE a public address for as long as I can, but it'll soon run out and then NAT444 will have to be used and some things will just not work very well.

--
Leigh Porter

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________