NAT444 or ?

Leigh Porter leigh.porter at
Wed Sep 7 10:11:18 UTC 2011

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arturo Servin [mailto:arturo.servin at]
> Sent: 07 September 2011 01:37
> To: Serge Vautour
> Cc: nanog at
> Subject: Re: NAT444 or ?
> 	NAT444 alone is not enough.
> 	You will need to deploy it along with 6rd or DS-lite.
> 	Whilst you still have global v4, use it. The best is to deploy
> dual-stack, but that won't last for too long.
> Regards,
> as-

I'm going to have to deploy NAT444 with dual-stack real soon now. So I am expecting to see some issues.

A+P would be nicer perhaps, but none of the CPE I have will support it. I'll try and give people who do NAT in their CPE a public address for as long as I can, but it'll soon run out and then NAT444 will have to be used and some things will just not work very well.

Leigh Porter

This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit 

More information about the NANOG mailing list