Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos
Brant I. Stevens
branto at networking-architecture.com
Tue Sep 6 18:10:22 UTC 2011
I'd say the 89x platform is the way to go if 8 ports weren't needed. Correct me if i am wrong...
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 6, 2011, at 1:34 PM, "Garrett Skjelstad" <garrett at skjelstad.org> wrote:
> Yes, but look in 891s at the remotes, the 19xx are too expensive for only 4 devices.... Just my 2c
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 6, 2011, at 10:22, "Ryan Finnesey" <rfinnesey at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> DMVPN would only work with 100% cisco hardware right?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Brant I. Stevens [mailto:branto at networking-architecture.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 10:26 AM
>> To: Brandon Kim; positivelyoptimistic at gmail.com; nanog group
>> Subject: Re: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos
>>
>> I would go with Cisco's DMVPN, and its multiple endpoint offerings. A 19xx
>> router sounds like it would meet your needs for the remotes.
>>
>> Spoke-to-Spoke tunnels are created on-demand, can use dynamic routing, and
>> it supports multicast for things like Music on Hold, etc.
>>
>> Contact me offline and I can share more.
>>
>> -Brant
>>
>> On 9/6/11 10:19 AM, "Brandon Kim" <brandon.kim at brandontek.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Yes, a SonicWALL NSA 240 has 8 interfaces built in....
>>>
>>> This sounds like a very fun project....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 08:49:13 -0500
>>>> Subject: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos
>>>> From: positivelyoptimistic at gmail.com
>>>> To: nanog at nanog.org
>>>>
>>>> Greetings
>>>>
>>>> We have acquired a new client that has 98 remote endpoints. At each
>>>> site there is a need for 4 ip telephones and two vpn tunnels back to
>>>> two separate datacenters. (1 voice, 1 citrix farm). The sites don't
>>>> talk
>>>> to each other, just to the two data centers.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have a suggestion for a single piece of hardware that
>>>> would support 8 or less Ethernet interfaces and the two vpn tunnels ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -Optimistic
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list