Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos

Dylan Ebner dylan.ebner at crlmed.com
Tue Sep 6 13:07:47 CDT 2011


IFRC, the 19xx and 18xx are slower than the new 89x series. We are transitioning away from 18xx because of limitations on the platform that the 89x doesn't have. When the 18xx came out a few years ago they were amazing, the new 89x are even better.
 



Dylan 


-----Original Message-----
From: Garrett Skjelstad [mailto:garrett at skjelstad.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 12:34 PM
To: Ryan Finnesey
Cc: nanoggroup
Subject: Re: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos

Yes, but look in 891s at the remotes, the 19xx are too expensive for only 4 devices.... Just my 2c

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 6, 2011, at 10:22, "Ryan Finnesey" <rfinnesey at gmail.com> wrote:

> DMVPN would only work with 100% cisco hardware right?  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brant I. Stevens [mailto:branto at networking-architecture.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 10:26 AM
> To: Brandon Kim; positivelyoptimistic at gmail.com; nanog group
> Subject: Re: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos
> 
> I would go with Cisco's DMVPN, and its multiple endpoint offerings.  A 19xx
> router sounds like it would meet your needs for the remotes.
> 
> Spoke-to-Spoke tunnels are created on-demand, can use dynamic routing, and
> it supports multicast for things like Music on Hold, etc.
> 
> Contact me offline and I can share more.
> 
> -Brant
> 
> On 9/6/11 10:19 AM, "Brandon Kim" <brandon.kim at brandontek.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Yes, a SonicWALL NSA 240 has 8 interfaces built in....
>> 
>> This sounds like a very fun project....
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 08:49:13 -0500
>>> Subject: Point to MultiPoint VPN w/qos
>>> From: positivelyoptimistic at gmail.com
>>> To: nanog at nanog.org
>>> 
>>> Greetings
>>> 
>>> We have acquired a new client that has 98 remote endpoints.  At each 
>>> site  there is a need for 4 ip telephones and two vpn tunnels back to
>>> two separate datacenters.  (1 voice, 1 citrix farm).   The sites don't
>>> talk
>>> to each other, just to the two data centers.
>>> 
>>> Does anyone have a suggestion for a single piece of hardware that 
>>> would support 8 or less Ethernet interfaces and the two vpn tunnels ?
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> -Optimistic
>>                         
> 
> 
> 
> 





More information about the NANOG mailing list