Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics

Leo Bicknell bicknell at ufp.org
Mon Sep 5 07:47:24 CDT 2011


In a message written on Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 04:16:45PM -0400, Sharon Goldberg wrote:
> An ISP might deploy S*BGP in order to increase the volume of traffic
> that it transits for its customers.

I think this phrase summarizes the problem with this argument nicely.

If, as an ISP, deploying a "secure" routing protocol changes my
traffic positively or negatively something is wrong.  Securing the
routing system should not alter the routing system.

I'm afraid as long as it does this work has an uphill battle.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20110905/61919f1a/attachment.bin>


More information about the NANOG mailing list