iCloud - Is it going to hurt access providers?
mohacsi at niif.hu
Sat Sep 3 22:07:19 UTC 2011
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
> Hey all,
> I've been thinking about the impact that iCloud (by Apple) will have on
> the Internet.
> My guess is that 99% of consumer internet access is Asymmetrical (DSL,
> Cable, wireless, etc) and iCloud when launched will 'upload' obscene
> amounts of gigs of music, tv, backups, email, photos, documents/data and
> so on to their data centres.
> Now, don't misunderstand me, I love the concept of iCloud, as I do
> DropBox, but from an Access Providers perspective, I'm thinking this
> might be a 'bad thing'.
> From what I can see there are some key issues:
> * Users with plans that count upload and download together.
> * The speed of Asymmetric tail technology such as DSL
> * The design of access provider backhaul (from DSLAM to core) metrics
> * The design of some transit metrics
> So basically the potential issue is that a large residential provider
> could have thousands of users connect to iCloud, their connections
> slowed because of uploading data, burning their included bandwidth caps,
> slowing down the backhaul segment of the network, and as residential
> providers are mostly download, some purchase transit from their
> upstreams in an symmetric fashion.
In my opinion. Home networking (including personal clouds) have to change
the brain damaged model of asymmetric tail technologies. Giving back the
original peer-to-peer nature of networking the asymmetricity of the
access technologies will not be tolerable in such a level (1:10) we have
today. Maybe 1:2 should be more acceptable.
You don't have to worry bout this changes, but access provider cannot
claim any longer 100MBps (while upload speed ~10 Mbps), but probably 60-70
Mbps (with upload ~ 30 Mbps).... They have to retune access services.
More information about the NANOG