Colocation providers and ACL requests

Paul Graydon paul at paulgraydon.co.uk
Tue Oct 25 19:15:19 CDT 2011


On 10/25/2011 08:43 AM, Christopher Pilkington wrote:
> Is it common in the industry for a colocation provider, when requested to put an egress ACL facing us such as:
>
>    deny udp any a.b.c.d/24 eq 80
>
> …to refuse and tell us we must subscribe to their managed DDOS product?
>
> -cjp
>
>
For colo?  No, filtering is the customers concern, unless failure to do 
so is causing a problem for the colo network.  Such services are almost 
always paid for add-ons to a colo package.  The colocation business is 
usually fairly low on the profit margin with most companies trying to 
get away with the bare minimum possible over and above the basics.



More information about the NANOG mailing list