Did Internap lose all clue?
zeusdadog at gmail.com
Thu Oct 20 20:54:22 UTC 2011
Well, it didn't say "router hops"... They could mean "AS hops" I
guess. I never trust marketing garbage anyway. It makes my head
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:48 PM, bas <kilobit at gmail.com> wrote:
> Recently I was contacted by an Internap sales person.
> The third line of the email read:
> "As you know well, BGP makes all routing decisions simply based on HOP COUNT"
> I blinked my eyes a couple of times.. Yes it really said hop count.
> Then I replied to the guy that if he tries to sell a technical product
> to technical people he should get his info straight.
> But he replied BGP actually makes decisions based on hop count.
> He even sent an URL from the internap website that states this
> On that page there is also this gem:
> "BGP relies on the premise that hops are responsible for packet loss
> and congestion, and therefore a route with fewer hops is inherently
> better. "
> I can imagine blatant misinformation like this from a shady startup
> trying to trick some sales with smoke and mirrors, but from Internap?
> -- Bas
More information about the NANOG