Please change Mailman back to NOT force the rewrite for Reply-to

Patrick W. Gilmore patrick at
Sat Oct 15 21:21:16 UTC 2011

On Oct 15, 2011, at 5:17 PM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> John Peach (john-nanog) writes:
>>> Normally I'd have just made this point privately, and perhaps only on 
>>> Futures, but since it seems to be a recent change, I'm doing the public 
>>> service of pointing it out, while asking that it be adjusted back.
>> I don't see that; I have to specifically choose to reply to the list.
>> Maybe someone, like me, sets their own reply-to to the list.
> 	From the headers.
> 	X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
> 	Precedence: list
> 	Reply-To: nanog at
> 	List-Id: North American Network Operators Group <>
> 	Mutt asks me, but other mailers might not.

Yes, he said he set reply-to  himself.  Look at your own post, it has no such header.


More information about the NANOG mailing list