where was my white knight....

Tue Nov 8 21:08:26 UTC 2011

On 8 Nov 2011, at 18:24, "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins at arbor.net> wrote:

> 
> On Nov 9, 2011, at 1:14 AM, <bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:
> 
>> that was/is kindof orthoginal to the question... would the sidr plan for routing security have been a help in this event? 
> 
> SIDR is intended to provide route-origination validation - it isn't intended to be nor can it possibly be a remedy for vendor-specific implementation problems.
> 
> Validation storm-control is something which must be accounted for in SIDR/DANE architecture, implementation, and deployment.  But at the end of the day, vendors are still responsible for their own code.
> 
> 

Indeed, we can expect new and exciting ways to blow up networks with SIDR. 

--
Leigh

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________