Rogers Canada using 220.127.116.11/8 for internal address space
matthew at matthew.at
Thu May 26 01:12:23 CDT 2011
On May 26, 2011, at 7:35 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Unfortunately, the FCC hasn't really allowed us to since it would be very
> hard to produce useful bandwidth by today's standards within the bounds
> of the spectrum we are allowed to use and the channel separations we
> are allowed to use.
You just need to move up in frequency a bit. My slowest ham-band link runs at 12 Mbps and my fastest at over 100 Mbps.
Good reminder that I should renumber the IPv4 portion of that network to somewhere in 18.104.22.168/8 however.
More information about the NANOG