Rogers Canada using 220.127.116.11/8 for internal address space
cjp at 0x1.net
Wed May 25 21:23:43 UTC 2011
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:24 PM, <bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:
> NOTE WELL - Just because -you- (for values of you) see no value in
> space assigned, does NOT give you the right to hijack said space
> for your own purposes. Nor does it look well for you to advocate
> hijacking someone elses space....
Indeed, arbitrary is arbitrary, be it ham radio operators or the DoD.
I was trolling hams on the list there, my apologies. FWIW, my box
18.104.22.168 hasn't been up in well over a decade. Would have been
nice if that packet radio masses kept up with (or ahead of) the
technology of the times. Our network went to 9600 baud user ports,
More information about the NANOG