Rogers Canada using 126.96.36.199/8 for internal address space
drc at virtualized.org
Wed May 25 17:26:56 UTC 2011
On May 24, 2011, at 8:22 PM, Jeremy wrote:
> As long as necessary precautions are taken (route filters, tunnels, VRF's)
> shouldn't this be technically feasible without any negative ramifications?
Any? Debatable. Doing stuff like this has costs, but I suspect the folks at Rogers aren't idiots and actually did a cost/benefit analysis.
> you theoretically use anyone's IP space, advertised or not, for this
> internal transit?
> I'm not saying it's a good idea, it's certainly more
> complex which leads to its own issues, but shouldn't it be possible?
Of course. Not even sure it is more complex.
More information about the NANOG