Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space
Steven Bellovin
smb at cs.columbia.edu
Wed May 25 02:50:10 UTC 2011
On May 24, 2011, at 9:29 06PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jimmy Hess" <mysidia at gmail.com>
>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 4:34 PM, <Vinny_Abello at dell.com> wrote:
>>> I think those within the organization that deploy those vehicles or
>>> are Navy SEALs might sit at different lunch tables than the guys worried
>>> about IP address collisions. ;-)
>>
>> The F/A-18 Hornets, F/A-22 Raptors are well, and good, but that's old
>> technology The folks in charge of the MQ-1 predator drones might sit closer to
>> the guys worried about the IP addresses.
>>
>> And automated drone strikes can always be blamed on a malfunction
>> caused by the hijacking
>
> If packets that control armed drones cross any router that has access even to
> SIPRnet, much less the Internet, someone's getting relieved.
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/Militants-Hack-Unencrypted-Drone-Feeds-477219/
--Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
More information about the NANOG
mailing list