Yahoo and IPv6

Matthew Kaufman matthew at matthew.at
Sun May 15 10:28:54 CDT 2011


On 5/15/2011 6:49 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
>
>
> On May 14, 2011 9:30 PM, "Matthew Kaufman" <matthew at matthew.at 
> <mailto:matthew at matthew.at>> wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > Sure, but NAT64 doesn't let SIP phones on an IPv6-only network talk 
> to SIP phones on an IP4-only network.
> >
>
> Right, that is why we have SBC / b2bue for the cases we want to work.
>

Ok, so you concede that NAT64 requires yet another device at the edge to 
make the SIP phones work...
>
>
> We have agreed to disagree on the value of this before.  Sorry your 
> not so popular protocol is going the way of EGP .... it's just not fit 
> for the evolving internet and will be subject to natural deselction. I 
> am sure you will disagree with that and insist every end user must 
> always support ipv4 because rtmfp is top of mind for so many users 
> .... but we can leave it at that ....please
>
>

...and we'll agree to disagree on this one (RTMFP)... and users will 
just be ok with BitTorrent and Skype not working on the v6-only + NAT64 
networks you're building, I suppose?

Matthew Kaufman



More information about the NANOG mailing list