owen at delong.com
Thu May 12 10:06:41 UTC 2011
On May 11, 2011, at 8:14 PM, ML wrote:
> On 5/11/2011 11:03 AM, james at jamesstewartsmith.com wrote:
>> I have had similar problems with our providers, and these are tier 1 companies that should have already been full deployed. These are also some of the more expensive providers on a per Mb basis. The one provider that was full IPv6 ready was Cogent. HE is also IPv6 (although we don't use them atm.)
> The same Cogent that asked me to pay extra for IPv6 and in return I get an incomplete IPv6 routing table?
We will happily provide you with a more complete IPv6 routing table, though we do, admittedly lack
routes from Cogent and a couple of other players that are having difficulty realizing that IPv6 peering
is somewhat different from IPv4.
More information about the NANOG