Yahoo and IPv6
warren at kumari.net
Tue May 10 20:31:17 UTC 2011
On May 10, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Igor Gashinsky wrote:
> On Tue, 10 May 2011, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> :: On 9 mei 2011, at 21:40, Tony Hain wrote:
> :: >> Publicly held corporations are responsible to their shareholders to get
> :: >> eyeballs on their content. *That* is their job, not promoting cool new
> :: >> network tech. When you have millions of users hitting your site every
> :: >> day losing 1/2000 is a large chunk of revenue.
> :: Nonsense. 0.05% is well below the noise margin for anything that involves humans.
> I assure you, it is not. 0.005% might be "in the noise", but 0.05% is
> quite measurable given a large enough audience.
> :: >> The fact that the big
> :: >> players are doing world IPv6 day at all should be celebrated, promoted,
> :: >> and we should all be ready to take to heart the lessons learned from
> :: >> it.
> :: I applaud the first step, but I'm bothered by the fact that no second step is planned.
> Just because it's not public, doesn't mean that it hasn't been planned :)
> Most of us want to see the data that we get from the first step, before
> making the decision on which second step to take, I'm sure most people
> can understand that.
Argck, I cannot believe that I am going to do this, let alone publicly, but here goes...
Igor is right on both counts here -- 0.05% is definitely noticeable at these sorts of scale, and I'd be shocked if Yahoo didn't have a set of alerts that fire if projections differ from actual traffic by this amount. I'm also a little surprised that you figured that there were no plans past the event -- much of the point of this is for data gathering -- did you figure folk were just going to gather the data and then ignore it?
Ok, that fully used up my "agreeing with Igor" quota for the year...
More information about the NANOG