jason at thebaughers.com
Tue May 3 14:41:41 UTC 2011
On 5/2/2011 4:11 PM, George Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Jeroen van Aart<jeroen at mompl.net> wrote:
>> Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
>>> On Mon, 02 May 2011 12:27:34 PDT, Jeroen van Aart said:
>>>> It surprised me because I, perhaps naively, assumed IT workers in general
>>>> have a rather broad knowledge
>>> Sorry to break it to you.
>> That's ok, the past tense in my story testifies to the fact I was already
>> aware of it. But thanks. ;-)
> There was a significant decline in knowledge as the .com era peaked in
> the 90s; less CS background required as an entry barrier, the
> employment pool grew fast enough that community knowledge
> organizations (Usenix, etc) didn't effectively diffuse into the new
> community, etc.
> The number of people who "get" computer architecture, ops, clusters,
> networking, systems architecture and engineering, etc... Not good.
Unfortunately we see this when we interview candidates. Even those who
have certifications generally only know how to do specific things within
a narrow field. They don't have the base understanding of how things
work, such as TCP/IP, so when they need to do something a little outside
of the normal, they flounder.
More information about the NANOG