Nortel, in bankruptcy, sells IPv4 address block for $7.5 million

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Thu Mar 24 15:26:32 CDT 2011


The judge definitely ruled that the transfer had to be done in a manner that
complied with ARIN policy and made it clear that the recipient was, indeed,
required to sign the RSA.

So, yes, Kremen also lost on the address policy basis, which I believe may
have been an additional ruling subsequent to what is covered at the cited URL.

Owen


Sent from my iPad

On Mar 24, 2011, at 12:24 PM, David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org> wrote:

> On Mar 24, 2011, at 8:15 AM, William Herrin wrote:
>> Legacy address transferability has been disputed before. Kremen v.
>> ARIN. Kremen lost.
> 
> Yes, Kremen lost, but not based on anything related to address policy:
> 
> http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2007/01/kremen_loses_ch_1.htm
> 
> Regards,
> -drc
> 




More information about the NANOG mailing list