Fwd: Service Provider Route Flap Damping Deployment Status Survey
shtsuchi at cisco.com
Mon Jun 27 08:31:08 UTC 2011
We really appreciate response to the survey.
We could get 63 response from global operators groups.
And we had published result of the survey as internet-draft.
We would like to refer the survey result to improve vender implementation.
Q2.Do you use Route Flap Damping ?
Q3.If you select No on Q2,why?
Do not have the need:10
Did not know about the feature:5
No benefits expected:10
Customer would complain:5
Because I read RIPE-379:15
Q4.If you select Yes on Q2,what parameter do you use?
Q5.Do you know Randy Bush et. al's report ''Route Flap Damping Considered Usable?''
Q6.IOS's max-penalty is currently limited to 20K.
Do you need this limitation to be relaxed to over 50K?
Q7.According to [draft-ymbk-rfd-usable],Suppress Threshold should
be set to 6K.Do you think the default value on implementations should be changed to 6K?
Q8.If you have any comments, please fill this box.
Please see the draft.
More information about the NANOG