BGP Design question.

Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Thu Jun 23 08:59:00 CDT 2011


On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 07:44:33 CDT, -Hammer- said:
> Agreed. At an enterprise level, there is no need to risk extended 
> downtime to save a buck or two. Redundant hardware is always a good way 
> to keep Murphy out of the equation. And as far as hardware failures go, 
> it's not that common. Nowadays it's the bugs in overly complicated code 
> on your gear that get you first. I miss IOS 11.3.....

So what you're saying is we're more likely to take an outage due to tripping
over a bug, so we should go for the simplest non-crossover config to minimize
the chances of hitting a bug. ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20110623/1bc768ef/attachment.bin>


More information about the NANOG mailing list