Address Assignment Question

William Herrin bill at herrin.us
Mon Jun 20 09:41:38 CDT 2011


On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Steve Richardson
<steverich.nanog at gmail.com> wrote:
> We have a customer who, over the years, has amassed several small subnet
> assignments from us for their colo.  They are an email marketer.  They have
> requested these assignments in as many discontiguous netblocks as we can
> manage.  They are now asking for more addresses (a /24s worth) in even more
> discontiguous blocks.  What I'd like to know is whether there is a
> legitimate use for so many addresses in discontiguous networks besides
> spam?

Hi Steve,

Best case scenario: they're using lists from their customers who
claimed they followed proper practices when building the lists but
didn't... because nobody who farms out bulk email builds a list via
"confirmed opt in" as expected by best practices. When one of the
lists gets filtered, they want the others to be protected.

Worst case scenario they are deliberately spamming and trying to hide
under the radar by spreading it out.


> I am trying my best to give them the benefit of the doubt here,
> because they do work directly with Spamhaus to not be listed (I realize
> reasons on both sides why this could be) and searches on Google and spam
> newsgroups for their highest traffic email domains yield next to nothing,
> given the amount of email they say they send out.

Try tools like http://www.mxtoolbox.com/blacklists.aspx and
http://www.anti-abuse.org/multi-rbl-check/ and run through their
existing address space. When you're skirting the gray zone, Spamhaus
is generally the last one to list you. Find out what the other RBLs
think.


> However, if they
> *are* legitimate, which certainly is possible, are discontiguous networks a
> common practice for even legit operators, as it's quite likely that even
> legit email marketers will end up being blocked because someone accidentally
> hit 'Spam' instead of 'Delete' in their AOL software?

If this was a brand new customer, I'd say hell no: they're obviously a
spammer. Since they've been with you for years and haven't tripped the
filters yet, I wouldn't be inclined to send them packing. As a
contingency to receiving the spread-out assignments, however, I would
ask them to sign a document to the effect that they only use email
lists built with confirmed opt-in with a stiff and escalating dollar
penalty clause should your abuse department receive convincing and
voluminous complaints that they didn't.

Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004




More information about the NANOG mailing list