ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
jra at baylink.com
Fri Jun 17 22:13:42 UTC 2011
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick at ianai.net>
> As for calling ICANN stupid, thinking this will help fracture the
> 'Net, I think you are all confused. I think the NANOG community has
> become (OK, always was) a bit of an echo chamber. Trust me when I say
> we are the minority. Most people think very differently, and we better
> accept that if we hope to affect things outside our little group.
We may be the minority, but my experience is we have a pretty good record
at spotting where the pinch points might come up in proposed expansions/
http://apple/ is going to break a bunch of shit.
(Ok, it might or might not break actual browsers, but I have seen "require at
least one dot or assume it's not a domain name" in *lots* of code; the
inability to put sjobs at apple in your address book will not be popular.)
Interstate-level traffic engineering types are not a big political bloc,
either... but no one ignores them when building Interstates.
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra at baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
More information about the NANOG