ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
Patrick W. Gilmore
patrick at ianai.net
Fri Jun 17 22:00:25 UTC 2011
On Jun 17, 2011, at 5:44 PM, Paul Graydon wrote:
> On 06/17/2011 11:33 AM, David Conrad wrote:
>> On Jun 17, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>>>> You just learned about this now?
>>> In fact I did. I certainly haven't seen it mentioned on NANOG in the last 6
>>> months or so; where should I have seen it?
>> New TLDs have been discussed now for over a decade. Press (both technical and popular) on ICANN activities have ratcheted up significantly recently, particularly with the approval of .XXX (which was recently discussed here on NANOG: http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2011-March/034488.html). Not blaming/accusing, just surprised this would be a surprise. I guess I've been living in the layer9 cloud too long....
> I've seen the stuff about adding a few extra TLDs, like XXX. I haven't seen any references until now of them considering doing it on a commercial basis. I don't mind new TLDs, but company ones are crazy and going to lead to a confusing and messy internet.
Yeah, 'cause it's not messy & confusing already....
The Internet is a business, ICANN wants money (despite their non-profit status - check out how much the execs get paid).
Companies want $FOO. They get $FOO, because they PAY FOR THE INTERNET. Without them, we all don't have jobs.
As for calling ICANN stupid, thinking this will help fracture the 'Net, I think you are all confused. I think the NANOG community has become (OK, always was) a bit of an echo chamber. Trust me when I say we are the minority. Most people think very differently, and we better accept that if we hope to affect things outside our little group.
More information about the NANOG