Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses

Gaurab Raj Upadhaya gaurab at lahai.com
Thu Jun 16 20:33:09 CDT 2011


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 6/15/11 5:47 PM, James Grace wrote:
> So we're running out of peering space in our /24 and we were
> considering using private /30's for new peerings.  Are there any
> horrific consequences to picking up this practice?

This might summarize it nicely.

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-kirkham-private-ip-sp-cores-04.txt

- -gaurab


- -- 

http://www.gaurab.org.np/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk36rtUACgkQSo7fU26F3X3WzQCcC0Hv62BTNK111mRs16ISJQ7o
ZfcAn05LoQuFTshG22QYLOmwdLnNm3GY
=vZI7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the NANOG mailing list