The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6
nanog at jima.tk
Wed Jun 15 17:29:09 UTC 2011
On 06/15/2011 11:45 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 15 jun 2011, at 18:39, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>> Maybe I'm missing something, but the last update on this was RFC
>> 5006 I think, which is marked as "experimental", and I thought the
>> IETF still had a working group discussing it.
> You missed the upgrade to proposed standard:
>> That is, I didn't think it was a finalized standard yet.
> The IETF rarely gets around to bringing something from proposed standard to standard. For instance, HTTP and BGP aren't standards either.
Thanks for the citation, right. I also probably should also have
-- the notable holdouts to RDNSS (that support DHCPv6) seem to be
Windows, Solaris, AIX, and IBM i. Unfortunate.
More information about the NANOG