The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6

Leo Bicknell bicknell at ufp.org
Wed Jun 15 11:39:06 CDT 2011


In a message written on Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:22:12AM -0500, Jima wrote:
>  Oh, oops; you did touch upon this.  You might want to let the people 
> who've implemented RDNSS in software know that the IETF is working on 
> it.  I'm sure that'll be a relief.

Maybe I'm missing something, but the last update on this was RFC
5006 I think, which is marked as "experimental", and I thought the
IETF still had a working group discussing it. 

That is, I didn't think it was a finalized standard yet.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20110615/f23fe4a2/attachment.bin>


More information about the NANOG mailing list