The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6
swmike at swm.pp.se
Tue Jun 14 08:48:23 UTC 2011
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Owen DeLong wrote:
> ND would be a far more frequent occurrence than DHCP requests.
Of course, it was only partly related to the discussion, most likely the
network which has problem with multicast would break first because of ND,
not because of DHCPv6 requests.
> Also, I tend to doubt that ANYONE would do DHCP on an exchange point
> network, so, it's not exactly an applicable example environment.
It's the largest IPv6 enabled L2 domain I've experienced :P
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
More information about the NANOG