The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6

Leo Bicknell bicknell at ufp.org
Sun Jun 12 20:29:18 CDT 2011


In a message written on Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 08:12:02PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> The IPv4 host does this once and gets its lease. If there is no DHCPv6 server then DHCPv6 clients would keep broadcasting forever. Not a good thing.

DHCP today uses an exponential backoff if there is no response, I don't
see why that can't be kept in IPv6.  Plus I wonder how long users would
keep on machines that get no useable network connectivity.  

I really think the number of broadcast packets is a total non-issue.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20110612/aa085551/attachment.bin>


More information about the NANOG mailing list