The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6
mpalmer at hezmatt.org
Mon Jun 13 01:03:26 UTC 2011
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 08:12:02PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 12 jun 2011, at 15:45, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> >> Like I said before, that would pollute the network with many multicasts which can seriously degrade wifi performance.
> > Huh? This is no worse than IPv4 where a host comes up and sends a
> > subnet-broadcast to get DHCP.
> The IPv4 host does this once and gets its lease. If there is no DHCPv6
> server then DHCPv6 clients would keep broadcasting forever. Not a good
You're not working from comparable situations. An IPv4 network without a
DHCP server will probably have lots of IPv4 hosts banging out broadcast
packets constantly as well.
A committee is a cul-de-sac down which ideas are lured and then quietly
-- Sir Barnett Cocks (1907-1989) (QOTD 20 Feb 2003)
More information about the NANOG