Quick comparison of LSNs and NAT64
dr at cluenet.de
Thu Jun 9 14:23:33 CDT 2011
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:39:17AM -0700, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> Each solution fits well for some set of constraints and objectives
Indeed. Unfortunately there's no good way to support v6-only clients in
an environment, where dual stacked endpoints do exist as well, see
RFC6147 (DNS64) ch. 6.3.2.
We still need to find some solution to that problem.
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
More information about the NANOG