Quick comparison of LSNs and NAT64

Daniel Roesen dr at cluenet.de
Thu Jun 9 19:23:33 UTC 2011

On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:39:17AM -0700, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> Each solution fits well for some set of constraints and objectives

Indeed. Unfortunately there's no good way to support v6-only clients in
an environment, where dual stacked endpoints do exist as well, see
RFC6147 (DNS64) ch. 6.3.2.

We still need to find some solution to that problem.

Best regards,

CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0

More information about the NANOG mailing list