Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day

Cameron Byrne cb.list6 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 8 07:47:32 CDT 2011


On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Martin Millnert wrote:
>
>> Owen,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>>> LSN is required when access providers come across the following two
>>> combined constraints:
>>>
>>>        1.      No more IPv4 addresses to give to customers.
>>>        2.      No ability to deploy those customers on IPv6.
>>
>> 2 has little bearing on need of LSN to access v4.  Insufficient amount
>> of IPv4 addresses => LSN required.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Martin
>
> No, if you have the option of deploying the customers on IPv6, you don't
> need LSN.
>
> The problem is that until the vast majority of content is dual-stack, you can't
> deploy customers on IPv6 without IPv4.
>
>

cough cough NAT64/DNS64 ...

Cameron

> Owen
>
>
>




More information about the NANOG mailing list