Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day

Jack Bates jbates at
Wed Jun 8 03:28:29 UTC 2011

On 6/7/2011 9:01 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Owen DeLong<owen at>  wrote:
>> Moving them to IPv6 and hoping that enough of the content providers
>> move forward fast enough to minimize the extent of the LSN deployment
>> required.
> The problem here is not content, it's access. Look at World IPv6 day.
> What percentage of web content is represented? Probably order of 10%.
> How about access? Our public stats still say 0.3%
0.3% of access is fine, so long as the margin of broken stacks and 
deployments is low enough. If they find that keeping the content dual 
stacked has acceptable problems, then it's just a matter of access 
gearing up to match. The largest fear for content is to dual stack and 
have service levels go down. The only data we really get from this day 
is a better understanding of the service levels when dual stacked at 
major content sites. Some access providers may also determine mistakes 
in their networks, or isolation or MTU issues through transit providers.


More information about the NANOG mailing list