Internap FCP

Suresh Ramasubramanian ops.lists at
Tue Jun 7 01:47:31 UTC 2011

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Nathan Stratton <nathan at> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2011, Ryan Pugatch wrote:
>> We are currently looking into Internap FCP as we are in the process of
>> redoing our network infrastructure and taking on managing BGP ourselves
> The reporting is not bad and it does an ok job. We ended up building our own
> because the FCP was not able to look at enough of the active flows. I
> believe the overall idea can provide a lot of value, it just was not the
> best solution for our needs.

Any alternatives?   To start with, able to optimize routes across say
two to four circuits.

Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at

More information about the NANOG mailing list