UN declares Internet access a "human right"
jcdill.lists at gmail.com
Mon Jun 6 05:40:57 UTC 2011
On 05/06/11 5:18 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 02:39:45 +0300, Gadi Evron said:
>> The title is misleading, as this is more about "denying" access. But
>> this is still quite interesting. I don't think this has *any*
>> operational implications, but every operator to see this was immediately
>> worried. I figure it warrants a discussion.
> No discussion needed - yes, it appears to conflict with "3 strikes you're off"
> copyright laws, until you accept that only criminals will get hit with 3
> strikes, and criminals can be required to give up some rights as punishment, so
> it's OK.
I will happily go along with this argument when the "3 strikes you're
off" copyright laws are enforced thru a process which A) assumes you are
innocent until proven guilty; B) that you are allowed to present a
defense and challenge all witnesses; and C) that you are entitled to
have your case heard by a jury of your peers. To the best of my
knowledge, none of the "3 strikes you're off" copyright laws proposed or
enacted have provided these basic human rights.
More information about the NANOG