NANOG List Update - Moving Forward

Wed Jul 13 04:50:43 UTC 2011

On Jul 12, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Larry J. Blunk wrote:
> 
>  I've have some concerns with AMS based on my experience
> with the IETF mailing list.  It has had ongoing issues with
> out-of-sequence delivery.  Based on the Received headers, it's
> seems pretty clear the re-ordering is occurring internal to the
> AMS servers.  It appears they may be trying something different
> with the NANOG list as the IETF list does not employ bulk_mailer.

ietf.org is mailman and postfix.

> -Larry
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 