Spam?

Tue Jul 12 16:22:09 UTC 2011

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Randy Bush" <randy at psg.com>

> > Also, where is the reply to header?
> 
> still in the garbage, where it belongs

NANOG, being a traditional, (semi-)public, technical mailing list, has never
had a Reply-to header, and never should.  I concur with the people who assert
that adding the Reply-to header formally violates the relevant RFCs, quite
aside from the Real World problems it can (and *has*) caused.

  http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra at baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA      http://photo.imageinc.us             +1 727 647 1274