Why is IPv6 broken?
Tom Hill
tom at ninjabadger.net
Mon Jul 11 07:25:12 UTC 2011
On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 10:14 -0400, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
> Cogent's policy of requiring a new contract, and from what I am still
> being told by some European customers, new money, from customers in
> exchange for provisioning IPv6 on existing circuits, means a simple
> technical project gets caught up in the complexities of budgeting and
> contract execution.
"Can we have IPv6 transit?"
"Yes, please turn up a session to.."
That was asking Cogent for IPv6 dual-stack on our existing IPv4
transit.
I'm not saying it's any good, but it certainly didn't cost extra.
Tom
More information about the NANOG
mailing list