Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed

Richard Barnes richard.barnes at gmail.com
Wed Jan 26 12:41:50 UTC 2011


Could you elaborate?  Which circumstances?

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> It works for routing native IPv6 under some circumstances as well.
>
> Owen
>
> On Jan 26, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Franck Martin wrote:
>>
>>> What about an Airport Extreme? It has a wan interface that does PPPOE
>>>
>>> The IPv6 feature seems working, with 6to4 or static tunnels and a basic IPv6 firewall.
>>
>> Yes it is. I already reported to Marco.
>> http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/content-ipv6-cpe-survey
>>
>> It should be included somehow in a matrix But 6to4 (or other tunneling techniques) is only a substitute of real IPv6.
>>
>> Regards,
>>       Janos Mohacsi
>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Mirjam Kuehne" <mir at ripe.net>
>>> To: nanog at nanog.org
>>> Sent: Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 3:34:14 AM
>>> Subject: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
>>>
>>> [apologies for duplicates]
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Based on new information we received since the last publication, we
>>> updated the IPv6 CPE matrix:
>>>
>>> http://labs.ripe.net/Members/mirjam/ipv6-cpe-survey-updated-january-2011
>>>
>>> In order to make this information more useful for a large user base, we
>>> are preparing a detailed survey to gather more structural feedback about
>>> the range of equipment that is currently in use. Not only would we like
>>> you to participate in this survey, but we also ask for your help in
>>> identifying the right survey questions. Please find a call for input on
>>> RIPE Labs:
>>>
>>> http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/future-of-the-ipv6-cpe-survey-more-input-needed
>>>
>>> Kind Regards,
>>> Mirjam Kuehne & Marco Hogewoning
>>> RIPE NCC
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>




More information about the NANOG mailing list