Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Wed Jan 26 03:23:33 CST 2011


It works for routing native IPv6 under some circumstances as well.

Owen

On Jan 26, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Mohacsi Janos wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Franck Martin wrote:
> 
>> What about an Airport Extreme? It has a wan interface that does PPPOE
>> 
>> The IPv6 feature seems working, with 6to4 or static tunnels and a basic IPv6 firewall.
> 
> Yes it is. I already reported to Marco.
> http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/content-ipv6-cpe-survey
> 
> It should be included somehow in a matrix But 6to4 (or other tunneling techniques) is only a substitute of real IPv6.
> 
> Regards,
> 	Janos Mohacsi
> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Mirjam Kuehne" <mir at ripe.net>
>> To: nanog at nanog.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 3:34:14 AM
>> Subject: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
>> 
>> [apologies for duplicates]
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Based on new information we received since the last publication, we
>> updated the IPv6 CPE matrix:
>> 
>> http://labs.ripe.net/Members/mirjam/ipv6-cpe-survey-updated-january-2011
>> 
>> In order to make this information more useful for a large user base, we
>> are preparing a detailed survey to gather more structural feedback about
>> the range of equipment that is currently in use. Not only would we like
>> you to participate in this survey, but we also ask for your help in
>> identifying the right survey questions. Please find a call for input on
>> RIPE Labs:
>> 
>> http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/future-of-the-ipv6-cpe-survey-more-input-needed
>> 
>> Kind Regards,
>> Mirjam Kuehne & Marco Hogewoning
>> RIPE NCC
>> 
>> 
>> 





More information about the NANOG mailing list