Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
bill at herrin.us
Thu Jan 13 11:56:58 CST 2011
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Dobbins, Roland <rdobbins at arbor.net> wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
>> The proxy capabilities of the firewall are additional security
>> measures on top of the NAT (and definitely should be
>> deployed for their higher security value).
> Not in front of servers, they shouldn't - because they have a negative security value in that context.
So all the folks who use reverse proxies like an http accellerator are wrong?
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
More information about the NANOG