Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?

Chuck Anderson cra at WPI.EDU
Thu Jan 13 07:18:00 CST 2011

On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:10:16PM -0800, Scott Weeks wrote:
> To be fair to Cisco and maybe I'm way off here. But it seems they do 
> come out with a way to do things first which then become a standard 
> that they have to follow.
> etherchannel/LACP

Yes, and then they keep their proprietary implementation instead of 
phasing it out, and no one migrates to the standard one which leads to 
vendor lockin.

More information about the NANOG mailing list