Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
owen at delong.com
Wed Jan 12 13:08:30 CST 2011
On Jan 12, 2011, at 9:07 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
> On 1/12/2011 11:01 AM, George Bonser wrote:
>> NAT66 is just
>> straight static NAT that maps one prefix to a different prefix.
> I'd eat a hat if a vendor didn't implement a PAT equivalent. It's demanded too much. There is money for it, so it will be there.
Fortunately, so far, it isn't. Hopefully we can cure the demand through education instead of acquiescence and profiteering.
More information about the NANOG