IPv6 - real vs theoretical problems

Dobbins, Roland rdobbins at arbor.net
Fri Jan 7 19:02:51 CST 2011

On Jan 8, 2011, at 3:29 AM, Deepak Jain wrote:

>  There are now years of security dogma that says NAT is a good thing, 

Actually, this isn't the case.  There's some *security theater* dogma which makes totally unsupported claims about the supposed security benefits of NAT, but that's not quite the same thing.


NAT has no inherent security benefits whatsoever, and quite a few security drawbacks.  

Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

Most software today is very much like an Egyptian pyramid, with millions
of bricks piled on top of each other, with no structural integrity, but
just done by brute force and thousands of slaves.

			  -- Alan Kay

More information about the NANOG mailing list