FAA - ASDI servers
nanog at deman.com
Tue Jan 4 23:01:59 CST 2011
Is that the FFA or the FAA?
On Jan 4, 2011, at 8:57 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
> Can they simply extend the mandate? We need to setup new connectivity
> to the FFA and was hoping to go IPv6 right out of the gate.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Oberman [mailto:oberman at es.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 11:12 PM
> To: Christopher Morrow
> Cc: Ryan Finnesey; nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: FAA - ASDI servers
>> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 22:49:34 -0500
>> From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists at gmail.com>
>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Ryan Finnesey
>> <ryan.finnesey at harrierinvestments.com> wrote:
>>> Very true but why the reference to vacuum tubes?
>> sadly it was an FAA computer system joke.
> But, since the "F" stands for Federal, if it is still up in two years,
> it must be reachable by IPv6. Today, the odds are pretty slim as almost
> no federal systems are reachable by IPv6. It will be an interesting two
> years for a lot of federal IT folks as the mandate is from the OMB who
> can pull a budget for non-compliance.
> R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
> Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
> Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
> E-mail: oberman at es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
> Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
More information about the NANOG