Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6

Dobbins, Roland rdobbins at
Mon Feb 28 10:34:34 CST 2011

On Feb 28, 2011, at 11:14 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:

>  IPv6-only viability is the real goal.  This is, in the long run, a transition from v4 to v6. Dual-stack is an interim stop-gap, not an end
> solution.

I think most everyone agrees with this.  However, getting experience with dual-stack is better than no experience with IPv6 at all.

This doesn't mean that dual-stack should be rolled out everywhere; just that doing so may in fact make sense in some situations, and will often result in folks getting some operational experience with IPv6 vs. none at all until some time in the distant future.

Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at> // <>

		The basis of optimism is sheer terror.

			  -- Oscar Wilde

More information about the NANOG mailing list