Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6
dougb at dougbarton.us
Sun Feb 27 17:34:13 CST 2011
On 02/27/2011 15:08, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Look, can we stop arguing about whether someone needs DHCP or not,
> whether they need SLAAC or not. Let's just get both solutions to a mature
> and useful state where a network administrator can pick the one that works
> best for their environment and move on.
Speaking as an OS implementor, no, please don't do that. :) Let SLAAC
be what it is, and give DHCPv6 feature parity with DHCPv4. Having all
options supported in both methods is N-squared complexity for OS
developers, never mind how difficult it's going to make actually using
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
More information about the NANOG